Download Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice by Artur Appazov PDF

By Artur Appazov

The booklet is a entire narration of using services in overseas legal trials delivering mirrored image on criteria in regards to the caliber and presentation of professional facts. It analyzes and reviews the foundations governing specialist proof in overseas felony trials and the options hired by means of assistance and courts depending upon professional proof and demanding situations that courts face picking its reliability. particularly, the writer considers how the procedural and evidentiary structure of foreign felony courts and tribunals impacts the courts’ skill to meaningfully contain specialist facts into the rational fact-finding process.

The publication presents research of the original homes of professional facts in comparison with different kinds of proof and the demanding situations that those homes current for fact-finding in foreign felony trials. It attracts conclusions concerning the volume to which particularized evidentiary principles for professional proof in overseas legal trials is in need of. in response to comparative analyses of suitable nationwide practices, the publication proposes procedural advancements to handle many of the demanding situations linked to using

expertise in overseas legal trials.

Show description

Read or Download Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice PDF

Similar forensic medicine books

Trauma-Biomechanik: Verletzungen in Straßenverkehr und Sport

In der Trauma-Biomechanik werden die Prinzipen der Mechanik auf biologisches Gewebe und menschliche Körper angewendet und deren Reaktion und Toleranz auf severe mechanische Belastung untersucht. Dabei ist das Verständnis der mechanischen Faktoren, die hauptsächlichen Einfluss auf die Funktionsfähigkeit und die Struktur des Gewebes haben, entscheidend, um Gegenmaßnahmen zur Minderung oder Verhinderung von Verletzungen zu entwickeln.

Die klinisch-pathologische Konferenz: Ein Beitrag zur Qualitätssicherung in der Medizin

Im klinischen Alltag findet eine fortschreitende fachliche Spezialisierung der ärztlichen Tätigkeit, verbunden mit einer immer subtileren Diagnostik, statt. Nach wie vor sind Diagnostik und Therapie am genauesten und preiswertesten durch die Obduktion und histologische Untersuchung überprüfbar. In der klinisch-pathologischen Konferenz werden die morphologischen Befunde zwischen Ärzten aller Fachrichtungen und Pathologen diskutiert.

Fundamentals of Forensic Science, Third Edition

The booklet comprises the binding ideas of forensic technology, together with the relationships among humans, locations, and issues as validated through transferred facts, the context of these humans, areas, and issues, and the meaningfulness of the actual facts stumbled on, in addition to its worth within the justice procedure.

Additional info for Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice

Sample text

Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 101. 63 Roberts, P. and Zuckerman A. (2010), Criminal Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 103-104. 64 Gosnell, C. (2010), Admissibility of Evidence in Khan. , Buisman, C. and Gosnel, C. (2010) Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 435. ”65 Thus, having initially determined that evidence has logical relevance to an issue in the trial, the judge must additionally satisfy him/herself that the evidence is sufficiently probative before it can be admitted.

40 Singh, A. (2010), Expert Evidence in Khan. , Buisman, C. and Gosnel, C. (2010) Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 604. 41 Prosecutor v. Galic´, Decision Concerning the Expert Witness Ewa Tabeau and Richard Philips. Case IT-98-29-T, 3 July 2002, para 2. g. Prosecutor v. Brđanin, Decision on Prosecution’s Submission of Statement of Expert Witness Ewan Brown. Case IT-99-36-T, 3 June 2003; Prosecutor v. Strugar, Decision on the Defence Motions to Oppose Admission of Prosecution Expert Reports Pursuant to Rule 94bis, Case IT-01-42-PT, 1 April 2004; Prosecutor v.

Written Reasoned Ruling on the Preliminary Characterization of Expert Witness TF1-296, Case SCSL-04-15-T, 14 July 2006, para. 13; see also Prosecutor v. , Decision on Fofana Submissions Regarding Proposed Expert Witness Daniel J. Hoffmann PhD, Case SCSL-04-14-T, 7 July 2006. 48 Prosecutor v. , Oral Decision on Qualification of Prosecution Expert Witness Jean Rubaduka, Case ICTR-99-50-T, 24 March 2004, p. 2. 49 Prosecutor v. Galic´, Decision Concerning the Expert Witnesses Ewa Tabeau and Richard Philips.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.35 of 5 – based on 46 votes